There is a growing trend in New Jersey to prosecute public servants for misconduct in office. This includes, but is not limited to, police officers, state workers, county employees, and elected officials. Further, the number of public servants being prosecuted for so-called misconduct in office is exponentially increasing. Meanwhile, the alleged evidence for such prosecutions appears to be thinning with each new case.

So what exactly is official misconduct? In a nutshell, the official misconduct statute, N.J.S.A. 2C:30-2, is an extremely broad statute that allows the State to prosecute public officials for various acts of misconduct in office. Most surprisingly, a public official can be charged with official misconduct even in situations where the alleged misconduct does not violate any laws. In essence, any violation of work policy could expose a public servant to charges of official misconduct.

To make matters worse, if you are charged with official misconduct and the State alleges that in committing the so-called misconduct, you received a benefit that either has no monetary value, or has a monetary value over $200.00, then you will likely be charged with second degree official misconduct – a charge that carries a penalty of no less than five years in prison. Furthermore, if you are charged with committing official misconduct on more than one occasion, the State may even charge you with committing a so-called “Crime or Pattern of Official Misconduct,” in violation of N.J.S.A. 2C:30-7.

Confused? You’re not alone. Recent Appellate and Law Division Opinions have wrestled with the vast breadth of the Official Misconduct statute. In fact, in 2008, the Appellate Division in State v. Thompson, et al, tried to explain the reach of the statute’s two subsections, noting that while subsection “a” did not require the commission of a crime to be held valid, subsection “b” did. Unfortunately, though the Thompson Court’s Opinion helped to curtail the reach of subsection “b” violations, it did very little to explain or rectify the breadth of subsection “a”. Thus, notwithstanding the Thompson decision, the official misconduct statute continues to confuse New Jersey citizens and attorneys alike.

If you or a loved one has been charged with Official Misconduct, it is crucial that you retain an aggressive attorney who understands the official misconduct statute and its current treatment by the Court. The Attorneys at the Law Offices of Kamensky Cohen & Associates have been providing aggressive legal representation for over thirty-five years. For a free consultation with one of our attorneys, please call Kamensky Cohen & Associates at 609) 394-8585.