• What is a “Malpractice” case?

What is a “Malpractice” case?
Damages due to the negligence of a professional (doctor, lawyer, accountant) who’s services were employed by the damaged party. These areas of the law are extremely complex and must be addressed by competent legal counsel. It is essential that you seek out the best services of the most competent Counsel to navigate through the minefields of this complicated area of the law. An attorney can be of service in bringing an action for the injured person against the negligent professional and finding the necessary experts to assess the extent of the damages. If you feel that a professional you have hired has not done an adequate job or has done something that ultimately created a problem and/or a loss for you, you should consult with Jerrold Kamensky and Associates to help you evaluate your options.

New Jersey law presently allows for two types of claims that can be brought when dealing with a fatality resulting from the negligent conduct of another.  They are the Wrongful Death and Survival Actions and they differ significantly as to the damages that can be recovered, the beneficiaries of the compensation, and the legal representative that can bring the claim.

Survival Action claims are brought for the damages that are sustained by the decedent from the onset of the injury caused by the negligent act (a tort) to the decedent’s death.  Generally, these damages consist of conscious pain and suffering claims, funeral expenses, medical bills, and lost wages that accrue between the time of injury and death.  Since these damages are damages that the decedent sustained, these damages will “pass through” the decedent’s estate.  This means that the only person with the legal capacity to bring a suit for the Survival Action is the Administrator or Executor of the Estate. The beneficiaries of the Estate’s recovery for a Survival Action will be limited to the heirs of the Estate whether named in a will or, if there is no will, determined by the laws of intestacy.

Wrongful Death claims are designed by our laws to compensate, in part, the people that sustained economic losses from the death of a loved one.  The emotional anguish and consequences of sustaining a tragic loss of a family member are not recoverable pursuant to the limitations of the laws of New Jersey.  Only the pecuniary losses are recoverable, which are the monetary value of the losses that the decedent may have provided or been expected to provide to the survivors.  These are specified as such things as financial support, advice, household services, guidance, care, companionship and comfort.

These pecuniary losses are determined to have a financial value, which can be awarded by the jury in a trial involving the death of another.  The courts are required to instruct the jury that they are not to award for the emotional component of the losses, only the financial value of the losses.  Courts will instruct a jury that they are not to consider the emotional satisfaction that would have been provided had the decedent lived, such as seeing a daughter walk down the aisle on her wedding day or the inability to hug a child.  These are the limitations that New Jersey law imposes on the potential recovery in a wrongful death action.

Kamensky Cohen is presently involved in several wrongful death claims that differ vastly in the amounts that can be recovered.  An example is a case involving a mother struck by a car who died instantly.  As there was no conscious pain and suffering due to the instantaneous death, and the woman did not work outside her home, the recovery is limited to the amount that a jury would award for the loss of advice, household services, guidance, care, companionship and comfort that might have been available to those entitled to receive those elements of damages in the remaining lifetime.  Our jury verdict research coupled with years of experience handling these matters, tells us that these cases are resolved for low six figure amounts.  If, however, the mother in question suffers for hours or days before her death and/or has had substantial earnings with a long remaining work life expectancy the damages that are recoverable could be in the millions.  While this does not seem fair or just to the survivors of such a tragic loss, this is New Jersey law as it presently stands, seeming to favor only those losses that can be quantified by economics.  While it is understood that no money can compensate for the emotional loss of a loved one, it is equally difficult to understand the legislators thinking in these arbitrary standards as to what “loss” is and what kinds of “value” to place upon it.

In any case, should your family face the tragedy of the loss of a loved one due to negligence of another, seek experienced legal advice and representation.  A good lawyer can help your family recover damages and, to the extent that it can ever be, help you address your grievances.

For more information please visit http://kc-law.net

There can, however, be a claim for the pain, suffering and loss of enjoyment of life against another party; i.e. a “third party claim” if the person causing your injuries is not employed by your employer. This “third party” can be anyone who causes your injury and is not employed by your employer. We have brought such claims against manufacturers of defective products, employees of other employers who may be working on the same job with you, or anyone other than a member of your company that has caused your injuries due to their negligence.

Sometimes, a third party claim can even be as remote as against the attorney who handled your Worker’s Comp claim and failed to file a third party claim on your behalf. Our office recovered a recovery in excess of $950,000.00 for a claim against another lawyer who failed to recognize the existence of the third party claim.

As stated above the general rule is that your employer or a co-employee cannot be held liable for injuries, aside from the benefits provided under the Workers Compensation Act (lost wages, medical expenses and a limited permanency award). There are some rare occasions that an employer can be sued for your injuries on the job. In 2002 the New Jersey Supreme Court decided the case of Laidlow v. Hariton Machinery Co., Inc., 170 N.J. 602 (2002) and the Court carved out a well reasoned exception to this general rule. The Supreme Court described the circumstances under which a co-employee or your employer can be held responsible for your injuries for damages in addition to his statutory responsibility under the Workers Compensation Act.

If the employer’s conduct can be considered intentional or reckless, that is, the employer must know that his actions are substantially certain to result in injury or death to the employee, then the employer can be held liable for damages beyond his responsibility for providing Worker’s Compensation benefits. This can mean tens or even hundreds of thousands of dollars in additional recoveries to you and your family for legitimate claims for pain, suffering, and the loss of enjoyment of life. Bottom line: if you are injured on the job, consult with a knowledgeable personal injury attorney before settling for what your employee or workers’ comp attorney offers. Our office offers skilled attorneys in the worker’s compensation law who work closely with our personal injury lawyers. Every worker’s compensation case that comes through our office is reviewed for third party actions.

Please visit KC-Law.net for more infoimation